I hate blogging. No one really cares about your day or what is on your mind. Blogging is for those people who have nothing better to do. So they rant and rave and try to be funny. Unfortunately for me I've been that guy before... and from the looks of it... not too long ago!!! Although in my defense, I started up the blog again so my family could try and keep track of my summer in D.C.!
Forrest has inspired me to post again. Blasted Norwegian. I can not and will not promise any future posts but if one shows up who knows what the reason may be?
Hillsdale tomorrow! This semester is going to rock... I hope!
Friday, January 8, 2010
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Summer Recess
Relatively speaking Rayburn and the rest of the Hill is DEAD right now with the House out to recess as of last week Friday. The Senate is set to head out this week Friday ending a busy legislative summer that seemed to give the Republicans some momentum.
Cap and Trade barely passed the House but its fate is even more uncertain in the Senate. Health care barely made it out of committee in the House. Momentum and public opinion is certainly helping those who oppose the President's plan. I am looking forward to seeing the Republican plan which will be introduced after recess. We can only be the party of "No" so long before we need to present our own ideas for true reform.
The week has been really slow in the office... making me only more anxious to get out of D.C. It has been a wonderful summer and I am thankful I had the opportunity to come down here and work. Each day I get a little bit more ready to head back to school.
Cap and Trade barely passed the House but its fate is even more uncertain in the Senate. Health care barely made it out of committee in the House. Momentum and public opinion is certainly helping those who oppose the President's plan. I am looking forward to seeing the Republican plan which will be introduced after recess. We can only be the party of "No" so long before we need to present our own ideas for true reform.
The week has been really slow in the office... making me only more anxious to get out of D.C. It has been a wonderful summer and I am thankful I had the opportunity to come down here and work. Each day I get a little bit more ready to head back to school.
Friday, July 31, 2009
The problem with "Conservatism"
HA! What a title for a blog post. Such a title really needs a book. Or two. Or three.
I've been thinking about this for quite some time now. A quote from a very smart and upstanding individual reignited the ongoing questions and debate I've been having with myself and others. This individual essentially argued for "revolution" within the conservative movement in order for it to survive. I'm paraphrasing of course, but he essentially complained that conservatism has become so watered down, that it has strayed from its principles.
I think there are a lot of problems with this type of thinking. Sadly, most people, even if they aren't as libertarian as this individual is, would agree that "conservatism" has lost its principles.
But what are the principles of conservatism?
Perhaps part of the problem is that conservatism has bought into the idea that for it to be successful, it must be political. Those who truly study conservatism know, that conservatism is inherently anti-political because it is inherently anti-ideological. Conservatism never looks to political solutions for answers. It does not hinge its success on the political success and failures of its political manifestations.
True conservatism is a way of life. And it has existed long before John Locke or the American Founding Fathers. It is a tradition of great thinkers, who together form what Christopher Dawson and T.S. Eliot understood to be a "Republic of Letters." Dawson's "Republic" never carried a political connotation. Rather it united an understanding of God, man, and man's place in the order of things. These things are in themselves, non-political.
Conservatism of course, has political manifestations. But the key to uncovering them, is not found through political means. I'm curious when conservatives will finally realize this... if they ever do. We can win as many offices and presidencies as we want. But until we understand our own specific place in the world, we will never change lives or minds. Perhaps the key is to first change ourselves.
I've been thinking about this for quite some time now. A quote from a very smart and upstanding individual reignited the ongoing questions and debate I've been having with myself and others. This individual essentially argued for "revolution" within the conservative movement in order for it to survive. I'm paraphrasing of course, but he essentially complained that conservatism has become so watered down, that it has strayed from its principles.
I think there are a lot of problems with this type of thinking. Sadly, most people, even if they aren't as libertarian as this individual is, would agree that "conservatism" has lost its principles.
But what are the principles of conservatism?
Perhaps part of the problem is that conservatism has bought into the idea that for it to be successful, it must be political. Those who truly study conservatism know, that conservatism is inherently anti-political because it is inherently anti-ideological. Conservatism never looks to political solutions for answers. It does not hinge its success on the political success and failures of its political manifestations.
True conservatism is a way of life. And it has existed long before John Locke or the American Founding Fathers. It is a tradition of great thinkers, who together form what Christopher Dawson and T.S. Eliot understood to be a "Republic of Letters." Dawson's "Republic" never carried a political connotation. Rather it united an understanding of God, man, and man's place in the order of things. These things are in themselves, non-political.
Conservatism of course, has political manifestations. But the key to uncovering them, is not found through political means. I'm curious when conservatives will finally realize this... if they ever do. We can win as many offices and presidencies as we want. But until we understand our own specific place in the world, we will never change lives or minds. Perhaps the key is to first change ourselves.
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Intern Lunch
Today the office scheduled the obligatory "farewell" lunch for their interns. I guess they do one every spring, summer, and fall since there are always interns in the office. Kathleen, who is the other intern in our office this past summer has her last day tomorrow. Next week with the recess, many of our staffers will be in and out of the office. Thus they decided to do the lunch today as both the congressman and the staff would be available.
You think staffers can debate policy... wait until you see them debate pizza toppings. In an intense half hour struggle, the pizza toppings were finally selected in a controversial compromised proposed by the chief of staff to let the interns select the toppings since it was technically their lunch.
I probably would not have gotten sentimental except they gave me a card! Then all sorts of emotions and thoughts took over...
After sitting down, as we got enjoyedconversation as a staff... I was thinking what a great summer it has been getting to know these people on a more personal basis. While we were sitting there, laughing a lot because that is what my office seems to do very well, it seemed as if everyone there was no longer a chief of staff, a communications director, a legislative assistant, an office manager, or a staff assistant. Rather we were Justin, Dave, RJ, Leah, and Keal... among others. I think that is the most rewarding part of any experience I've ever encountered. Getting to know people for who they are beyond the labels they identify themselves with, and the boxes the world places them on.
In my own life the most enriching relationships I have are with those I would never have expected as much. I may never encounter these people again in this life, but I am blessed with the opportunity to know them as people... outside of their jobs... if even for little glimpses at small moments in time.
You think staffers can debate policy... wait until you see them debate pizza toppings. In an intense half hour struggle, the pizza toppings were finally selected in a controversial compromised proposed by the chief of staff to let the interns select the toppings since it was technically their lunch.
I probably would not have gotten sentimental except they gave me a card! Then all sorts of emotions and thoughts took over...
After sitting down, as we got enjoyedconversation as a staff... I was thinking what a great summer it has been getting to know these people on a more personal basis. While we were sitting there, laughing a lot because that is what my office seems to do very well, it seemed as if everyone there was no longer a chief of staff, a communications director, a legislative assistant, an office manager, or a staff assistant. Rather we were Justin, Dave, RJ, Leah, and Keal... among others. I think that is the most rewarding part of any experience I've ever encountered. Getting to know people for who they are beyond the labels they identify themselves with, and the boxes the world places them on.
In my own life the most enriching relationships I have are with those I would never have expected as much. I may never encounter these people again in this life, but I am blessed with the opportunity to know them as people... outside of their jobs... if even for little glimpses at small moments in time.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Eliot and the "world"
Eliot writes in Burnt Norton that "to be conscious is not to be in time." Such a thought centers around what I believe to be Eliot's understanding of time which relates to how we understand true being and reality. One might wonder why this matters...
It seems that Eliot connects understanding ones place in the order of things to how one views his current place in life. From a logical standpoint, why wouldn't there be a correlation?
What does Eliot mean when he says "that which is only living, can only die"? Perhaps "only living" equates to being "caught in the form of limitation" which Eliot describes as "between un-being and being." Perhaps life in this world is being caught between living and dying, but never sure how to live between them until you actually die.
For Eliot this world, which is not permanent, is a problem because it attempts to satisfy what it is not able to satisfy.
Like Scripture, Eliot notes the folly within the wisdom and attitude of the world. He writes in East Coker "The only wisdom we can hope to acquire Is the wisdom of humility: humility is endless." Eliot reminds us of the inherently temporary state of the world:
In order to arrive at what you are not
You must go through the way in which you are not.
And what you do not know is the only thing you know
And what you own is what you do not own
And where you are is where you are not.
We are not created for this world and should never become truly satisfied in it. "As we grow older" writes Eliot, "The world becomes a stranger."
I do not think Eliot is suggesting that we not attempt to live or minister to this world. But fundamentally, we must have an understanding of our true place and being in something much higher than this world can ever offer.
It seems that Eliot connects understanding ones place in the order of things to how one views his current place in life. From a logical standpoint, why wouldn't there be a correlation?
What does Eliot mean when he says "that which is only living, can only die"? Perhaps "only living" equates to being "caught in the form of limitation" which Eliot describes as "between un-being and being." Perhaps life in this world is being caught between living and dying, but never sure how to live between them until you actually die.
For Eliot this world, which is not permanent, is a problem because it attempts to satisfy what it is not able to satisfy.
Like Scripture, Eliot notes the folly within the wisdom and attitude of the world. He writes in East Coker "The only wisdom we can hope to acquire Is the wisdom of humility: humility is endless." Eliot reminds us of the inherently temporary state of the world:
In order to arrive at what you are not
You must go through the way in which you are not.
And what you do not know is the only thing you know
And what you own is what you do not own
And where you are is where you are not.
We are not created for this world and should never become truly satisfied in it. "As we grow older" writes Eliot, "The world becomes a stranger."
I do not think Eliot is suggesting that we not attempt to live or minister to this world. But fundamentally, we must have an understanding of our true place and being in something much higher than this world can ever offer.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Rotunda Tour... and Time...
Today I got to do one of the most incredible things I have ever done... which perhaps suggests that I have not lived a very incredible life...
Thanks to the persevering work of Leah our executive assistant, our office was able to schedule a Rotunda tour for the interns! Kathleen and I were able to invite two friends each so logically I picked Will and Zach knowing that they will likely read these words someday and will no doubt be flattered. The tour was of course amazing... indescribable really... and it was a great way to (almost) end my internship.
Thinking about myself four years ago, I would have been so pleased with the idea of a Capitol internship for the sake of my future political career. Obviously things have changed and I'm not altogether certain what direction this next year will bring.
Many of my recent feeble attempts to think "intellectual" thoughts have focused on T.S. Eliot's conception of Time in the Four Quartets. C.S. Lewis also deals with this subject in a very similar manner I think... throughout his writings. Going through "Screwtape Letters" at the beginning of summer has allowed me to keep thinking about the similarities in Eliot's and Lewis's understanding of time.
Both note a tension in human beings. We are made for eternity but we live in time. God Himself is outside of time. He is the beginning and the end, and thus naturally does not operate by the human and finite understanding of time. In this sense, God is outside of time because he is eternal. Eliot writes in "Little Gidding" that history is a pattern of "timeless" moments... The moments in time which somehow are eternal for they have greater meaning outside of this temporary world.
Lewis suggests that since we are created for eternity, while we are on earth, God wishes for us to attend to the Present, "For the Present is the point at which time touches eternity." In these
"present moments" can humans experience true reality, which is outside of time for true reality is an encounter with our Creator. It is in our Creator, that the Apostle said on Mars Hill that "we live and move and have our being."
Thus, Lewis warns against both dwelling too much in the past, but especially in the future claiming that the future is "the thing least like eternity" for it is the "most completely temporal part of time." Ideology, evolution, scientific humanism, and of course Communism all fix men's eyes upon the future, the "very core of temporality."
Men must instead focus on "today's duty." I think this reminder is good not just in a practical sense... because I cannot worry what the next year will bring, but also in an eternal sense. God's will will be made known to me, He has promised me this and I can trust His promises for they are faithful. I think this is what Eliot means when he writes:
Time past and time future
What might have been and what has been
Points to one end, which is always present
Regardless of where we are in life we are called to pursue those things that are timeless. God's grace allows us to comprehend beyond what is temporary and live inside the eternal present, the moments which God makes us truly alive...
Thanks to the persevering work of Leah our executive assistant, our office was able to schedule a Rotunda tour for the interns! Kathleen and I were able to invite two friends each so logically I picked Will and Zach knowing that they will likely read these words someday and will no doubt be flattered. The tour was of course amazing... indescribable really... and it was a great way to (almost) end my internship.
Thinking about myself four years ago, I would have been so pleased with the idea of a Capitol internship for the sake of my future political career. Obviously things have changed and I'm not altogether certain what direction this next year will bring.
Many of my recent feeble attempts to think "intellectual" thoughts have focused on T.S. Eliot's conception of Time in the Four Quartets. C.S. Lewis also deals with this subject in a very similar manner I think... throughout his writings. Going through "Screwtape Letters" at the beginning of summer has allowed me to keep thinking about the similarities in Eliot's and Lewis's understanding of time.
Both note a tension in human beings. We are made for eternity but we live in time. God Himself is outside of time. He is the beginning and the end, and thus naturally does not operate by the human and finite understanding of time. In this sense, God is outside of time because he is eternal. Eliot writes in "Little Gidding" that history is a pattern of "timeless" moments... The moments in time which somehow are eternal for they have greater meaning outside of this temporary world.
Lewis suggests that since we are created for eternity, while we are on earth, God wishes for us to attend to the Present, "For the Present is the point at which time touches eternity." In these
"present moments" can humans experience true reality, which is outside of time for true reality is an encounter with our Creator. It is in our Creator, that the Apostle said on Mars Hill that "we live and move and have our being."
Thus, Lewis warns against both dwelling too much in the past, but especially in the future claiming that the future is "the thing least like eternity" for it is the "most completely temporal part of time." Ideology, evolution, scientific humanism, and of course Communism all fix men's eyes upon the future, the "very core of temporality."
Men must instead focus on "today's duty." I think this reminder is good not just in a practical sense... because I cannot worry what the next year will bring, but also in an eternal sense. God's will will be made known to me, He has promised me this and I can trust His promises for they are faithful. I think this is what Eliot means when he writes:
Time past and time future
What might have been and what has been
Points to one end, which is always present
Regardless of where we are in life we are called to pursue those things that are timeless. God's grace allows us to comprehend beyond what is temporary and live inside the eternal present, the moments which God makes us truly alive...
Saturday, July 25, 2009
"Center" Government
I've realized what an interesting summer it is to be in Washington D.C. It is historic in which the nation's first black (sort of) President appointed the nation's first (maybe) Hispanic justice to the United States Supreme Court. Obama's agenda has been the most liberal, most progressive agenda our nation has ever seen. In my view, he has already outdone FDR and he is not even one year into his presidency. Just the government takeover of what were private industries and banks signals a step further than FDR. The largest majority by the Democrats in recent history has also yielded a history infighting that is impossible to ignore.
These same questions exist on the Republican side as well. The question of winning seats/sticking to one's "principles" seems to lack a fairly cohesive answer. Certain divisions seem to be put aside when there is a strong leader to the political party. George W's strength in 2004 quelled internal party dissension... Barack Obama's strength seems to have ignited the Democrats to electoral success. However a very different result seems to be in store for Obama's legislative agenda.
The "Blue Dog" Democrats are a group that fascinates me. Dr. Bobb wants to spend some time identifying them and researching their districts a bit. It is no secret that they come from relatively "conservative" districts elected in the Democratic waves of 2006 and 2008 in which the Republicans were "out of touch" with their constituents. The centrist policies of the Blue Dogs seems to be giving Nancy Pelosi and President Obama major headaches. It is no secret that Pelosi had to arm twist Republican votes to pass cap and trade. As for health care, the Democrats for now have woken up and realized that the proposed legislation by Waxman and the rest of the progressive caucus, would fail by an overwhelming vote...
I'm impressed with the Blue Dog's policy of fiscal conservatism and for the most part social conservatism. I like that they seem to understand the interests of their constituents.. and that what is needed is not an abolishment of entitlement programs, but a reform of the current system. This type of government might serve America good for certainly far-right and far-left government has proven to be ineffective.
In my last two weeks here, I will be keeping a close on the Blue Dogs. Ultimately they may have a bigger share of power than anyone ever imagined headed into the 111th Congress.
These same questions exist on the Republican side as well. The question of winning seats/sticking to one's "principles" seems to lack a fairly cohesive answer. Certain divisions seem to be put aside when there is a strong leader to the political party. George W's strength in 2004 quelled internal party dissension... Barack Obama's strength seems to have ignited the Democrats to electoral success. However a very different result seems to be in store for Obama's legislative agenda.
The "Blue Dog" Democrats are a group that fascinates me. Dr. Bobb wants to spend some time identifying them and researching their districts a bit. It is no secret that they come from relatively "conservative" districts elected in the Democratic waves of 2006 and 2008 in which the Republicans were "out of touch" with their constituents. The centrist policies of the Blue Dogs seems to be giving Nancy Pelosi and President Obama major headaches. It is no secret that Pelosi had to arm twist Republican votes to pass cap and trade. As for health care, the Democrats for now have woken up and realized that the proposed legislation by Waxman and the rest of the progressive caucus, would fail by an overwhelming vote...
I'm impressed with the Blue Dog's policy of fiscal conservatism and for the most part social conservatism. I like that they seem to understand the interests of their constituents.. and that what is needed is not an abolishment of entitlement programs, but a reform of the current system. This type of government might serve America good for certainly far-right and far-left government has proven to be ineffective.
In my last two weeks here, I will be keeping a close on the Blue Dogs. Ultimately they may have a bigger share of power than anyone ever imagined headed into the 111th Congress.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
